One paragraph in this link is so important that I quoted it here: Neuroses may therefore very frequently produce secondary magnesium depletion. They require their own specific anti-neurotic treatment and not mere oral magnesium physiological supplementation, but both genuine forms of neurosis due to primary neural magnesium deficiency and magnesium depletion secondary to a neurosis may exist. These two conditions may be concomitant and reinforce each other.
The police trade union has thrown a virutally impregnable protective wall around its members Nick Cohen Observer - Sunday August 26, To date, the newish Criminal Case Review Commission has examined claims from 3, convicts that they were falsely imprisoned.
Can you make a stab at estimating how many have been upheld? Before you speculate, remember the cynical wisdom that everyone in jail will swear on all they hold sacred that they're innocent. The cynics aren't all wrong. I've no doubt that some lags were trying it on when they attempted to persuade the commission's civil servants to raise doubts about their convictions before the Court of Appeal.
You shouldn't forget either that jail cells are a fourth-rate substitute for closed mental hospitals. They hold luckless beneficiaries of 'community care' who can protest that they've been framed with genuine sincerity.
Unfortunately they can also be howling mad. You must therefore discount the chancers and the deluded, while remembering there is no fouler offence than the state jailing the innocent. Once you've made the necessarily loose calculations, you're ready to play fantasy justice and give your best guess of the percentage of complainants who have good grounds for arguing they're the victims of incompetent or malicious prosecutions.
My guess is a conservative Observer reader might imagine that the commission and appeal judges have a love of truth strong enough to push them to examine a quarter of disputed verdicts. An ultra-conservative might go as low as a tenth. Actually the commission has decided that only cases should be referred to the court.
Of these, the judiciary ruled that a paltry 53 convictions should be overturned. The hit rate is 1. There's nothing as terrifying as a vicious policeman.
He can attack with the privileges of the law as his Praetorian Guard. If you fight back, you're committing an offence. Passivity is the only safe response; safe, that is, unless your injuries are fatal.
|Latest International Headlines||Tweet on Twitter Around the world, Internet censorship is growing.|
|Lexis Advance - Online Legal Research |LexisNexis||It may be carried out by governments or by private organizations either at the behest of government or on their own initiative. Individuals and organizations may engage in self-censorship on their own or due to intimidation and fear.|
Hollywood got the unaccountable power of violent authority just right in 48 Hours when it had Eddie Murphy bellowing at a bar stuffed with rednecks: A nigger with a badge. Between and1, people died in police custody, prisons and secure psychiatric hospitals.
Caveats must be made once again. Many deaths were unavoidable suicides or accidents. Nevertheless, not one death was followed by the successful prosecution of an officer of the law.
The hit rate in this instance is no fraction of any per cent whatsoever. The criminal justice system can forgive with the empathy of a doped-out aromatherapist when necessary.
The civil libel courts are just as permissive. Together they won 96 defamation cases in a row. Memories had faded and witnesses had vanished: The typical target would be local papers or TV stations without the resources to risk hundreds of thousands in fantastically expensive court hearings.
They might have thought they were on firm ground because they didn't name names in innocuous reports of an inquiry into police going over the top on a Saturday night, for instance, or an investigation into an anonymous officer.
Their restraint didn't bother The Fed. It was easy money and a standing joke. Officers called them 'garage actions'.Around the world, Internet censorship is growing.
There has been significant growth in Internet censorship recently in the United States, India, Germany, Brazil, China, Iran, Ukraine, and Mexico. This means that during our lifetime, 6 out of 10 people worldwide have seen increased restrictions on Internet usage.
In total, it is estimated that 80% of [ ]. Censorship -- the control of the information and ideas circulated within a society -- has been a hallmark of dictatorships throughout history.
Due to the technical make-up of the Internet there are several strong technical arguments to be made against Internet censorship. The main categories these fall into are: it requires far-reaching infrastructural and topological changes to the network;.
Should The Government Censor The Internet Media Essay. Print Reference this.
Published: 23rd March, This essay examines the arguments against internet censorship by government, its impact, successes and failures of government in some countries that embarked on such projects, and the challenges they have faced.
The common argument used. 11 Biggest Pros and Cons of Censorship Censorship is a topic that is spreading like wildfire in our society today. Censorship refers to the government controlling any type of idea of information and withholding it .
Internet censorship is control or suppression of the publishing or accessing of information on the Internet. It may be carried out by governments or by private organizations either at the behest of government or on their own initiative.
Landier expands his argument by claiming that those who impose censorship must consider what they censor.